Muraleedharan v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 26TH KARTHIKA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 7297 OF 2020
PETITIONER/S:
MURALEEDHARAN AGED 53 YEARS S/O. MADHAVA MENON, SWATHY, PUZHALIDAM, ALATHUR, KIZHAKKENCHERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. P.R.VENKATESH SRI.G.KEERTHIVAS
RESPONDENTS:
2 SHANAVAS, GENERAL SECRETARY, ANTI-CORRUPTION MOVEMENT, KERALA, SHA MANZIL, AMAKKULAM, VADAKKENCHERY, PALAKKAD 678 683
GP – SRI. RIYAL DEVASSY
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C). No.7297 of 2020
: 2 :
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE
sm/
MURALEEDHARAN
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PALAKKAD
SHANAVAS
VIJU ABRAHAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court