Dismissed

Binesh Kumar E.S v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Kerala HC17 Nov 2023WP(C)/33507/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition seeks a direction to the Revenue Divisional Officer to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's Form-6 Application regarding his property. The court disposed of the petition by directing the respondent to pass orders within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Form-6 Application within three months.

Binesh Kumar E.S Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer — Land Acquisition | Kerala HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 26TH KARTHIKA, 1945

¶5

WP(C) NO. 33507 OF 2023

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

BINESH KUMAR E.S
AGED 44 YEARS
S/O SIDARTHAN(LATE),
LOGICS INFOTECH, ROSE GARDEN, 4/181,
NEAR POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE,
KODUMBU, PALAKKAD,, PIN - 678551
BY ADVS.
RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY
V.RAGHUVARAN
MAYA C.P.
VIJINA K.
ARUL MURALIDHARAN

¶8

RESPONDENT:

¶9

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER
PALAKKAD, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
PALAKKAD, PIN - 678001

¶10

SRI RIYALDEVASSY, SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶11

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
17.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶12

WPC No.33507 of 2023

¶13

¶14

VIJU ABRAHAM, J.

¶15

------------------------------------

¶16

W.P.(C.) No.33507 of 2023

¶17

------------------------------------

¶18

Dated this the 17^th day of November, 2023

¶19

JUDGMENT

¶20

Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6, Form-6 application. The petitioner is the owner of 0.1356 hectares of property, comprised in Re-survey No.597/18 of Kodumbu Village.

¶21

Heard the learned Government Pleader

¶22

also.

¶23

After hearing both sides, the above writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 Form-6 application in accordance with law, within

¶24

WPC No.33507 of 2023

¶25

¶26

a period of three months from the date of receipt

¶27

of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM

JUDGE

SKP/17-11

WPC No.33507 of 2023

¶33

¶34

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 33507/2023

¶35

`PETITIONER’S EXHI`	`BITS:`
`EXHIBIT P1`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE` `2770/2023 DATED17-` `EXECUTED IN FAVOUR`	`REGISTERED SALE DEED NO.` `5-2023 OF SRO, PALAKKAD` `OF PETITIONER IS PRODUCED`
`EXHIBIT P2`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE` `D.DIS M.204/05/SR I` `PETITIONER -MOHANAN`	`ORDER DATED 2-3-2005 IN` `SSUED TO ASSIGNOR OF` `BY THE 1 ST RESPONDENT`
`EXHIBIT P3`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE` `DATED 24-12-07 PASS` `FAVOUR OF ASSIGNOR`	`ORDER DATED D.DIS. M 640/06` `ED BY THE RESPONDENT IN` `OF PETITIONER -MOHANAN`
`EXHIBIT P4`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE` `DATED 28-5-2022 AS` `PASSED BY RESPONDEN`	`ORDER IN RDO PKD/909/2022-J3` `PER SERIAL NO.4 THEREIN` `T`
`EXHIBIT P5`	`P-1. A TRUE COPY OF` `DATED 20-6-2023 ISS` `THE OFFICE OF THE K`	`THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE` `UED TO THE PETITIONER FROM` `ODUMBU VILLAGE`
`EXHIBIT -P6`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE` `THE PROVISIONS OF T` `2023 SUBMITTED BY T` `RESPONDENT`	`APPLICATION IN FORM 6 UNDER` `HE ACT 28/2008 DATED 20-9-` `HE PETITIONER BEFORE THE`

¶36

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL

¶37

TRUE COPY

¶38

P.A. TO JUDGE

Binesh Kumar E.S v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Binesh Kumar E.S v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Russal M.Easa Vs State of Kerala

Seby Alex, Vs Revenue Divisional Officer

Rajan Vs District Collector

Muraleedharan Vs the District Collector

Saritha Benny Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Saraswathi Amma Vs the State of Kerala