P.v.George Tharakan v. the Revenue Divisional Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition filed in 2013 was heard on 21 February 2023. The court found the matter to have become infructuous and dismissed the petition accordingly.
A writ petition filed in 2013 was heard on 21 February 2023. The court found the matter to have become infructuous and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 2ND PHALGUNA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 3074 OF 2013
PETITIONER:
P.V.GEORGE THARAKAN
MANGALAMUTTATH PARAYIL,
EZHUPUNNA, CHERTHALA,
ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT
BY ADVS.
SRI.N.RAGHURAJ
SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, IDUKKI2THE DEPUTY THAHSILDAR/ ASSISTANT CARDAMOM SETTLEMENT
OFFICER,
O/O THE ASSITANT CARDAMOM SETTLEMENT OFFICER, SPRING
VALLEY P.O, KUMALI 685509
3 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, UDUMBANCHOLA VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT 6856144 M.M. MATHEW, MYLADATHU HOUSE, ANAKKARA VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA, IDUKKI DISTRICT 685614BY ADVS.
JUSTIN JACOB, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER
SRI.A.SHAFEEK KAYAMKULAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
21.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 3074 OF 2013 -2-
JUDGMENT
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that
the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL JUDGE
vv
P.V. GEORGE THARAKAN
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, IDUKKI
THE DEPUTY THAHSILDAR/ ASSISTANT CARDAMOM SETTLEMENT OFFICER
THE VILLAGE OFFICER, UDUMBANCHOLA
M.M. MATHEW
AMIT RAWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court