Golden Entertainment v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
On an application under an arbitration clause in an amusement park license agreement, this court appointed a retired judge as an independent arbitrator after respondents did not oppose the appointment.
What did the court decide?
Appointment of retired Justice A.M.Shaffique as the independent arbitrator under the agreement.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 1ST PHALGUNA, 1944
AR NO. 6 OF 2023
PETITIONERS:
1M/S GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT
DOOR NO.KC/XV/1622
CHILDREN'S PARK,
ASRAMAM, KOLLAM - 691001
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, MR.GIREESH KUMAR,
2 MR.GIREESH KUMAR S/O CHENTHAMARAKSHAN, AGED 55 YEARS, KOTTOOR VEEDU, ELAMBALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN – 691504
BY ADVS.
C.R.SYAMKUMAR
P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR
SREELATHA PARAMESWARAN NAIR
RENOY VINCENT
HELEN P.A.
ARUN ROY
ATHUL ROY
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., PIN – 695001
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to appoint an independent arbitrator under the arbitration clause of the agreement for amusement park operation.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
M/S GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN KOLLAM DISTRICT
- respondent
SECRETARY DISTRICT TOURISM PROMOTION COUNCIL
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court