Neethu B v. Anish V.B
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge transferred OP No. 383/2023 from Family Court, Ernakulam, to Family Court, Muvattupuzha, as the petitioner-wife resides there, citing Supreme Court authority on forum convenience.
What did the court decide?
Transfer of OP No. 383/2023 from Family Court, Ernakulam, to Family Court, Muvattupuzha, with transmission of records.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 12TH KARTHIKA, 1945
TR.P(C) NO. 229 OF 2023
AGAINST OP.No.383/2023 OF FAMILY COURT,ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
NEETHU B AGED 30 YEARS W/O ANISH V.B VADAKKEKARAYIL HOUSE, KALAMPOOR KARA, ENANALLOOR P.O MUVATTUPUZHA TALUK, PIN - 686673 BY ADVS. ALIAS M.CHERIAN K.M.RAPHY BRISTO S PARIYARAM ARUN C.S.
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
ANISH V.B AGED 34 YEARS, S/O K.A.BABU, RESIDING AT VADAKKEDATH HOUSE, VADAKKEDATH ROAD AYYAPAM KAVU ERNAKULAM NORTH P.O ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682018
THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 03.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the transfer of a matrimonial money claim petition to the family court within the wife's jurisdiction is maintainable based on her convenience.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
NEETHU B AGED 30 YEARS W/O ANISH V.B
- respondent
ANISH V.B AGED 34 YEARS
Coram
C. JAYACHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court