Dismissed
Geetha Prakash v. Santha
Kerala HCTr.P(C)/210/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a transfer petition citing a report that the underlying appeal was filed against a decree passed by the predecessor Munsiff, averring no need for transfer to the District Judge.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
¶4
FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 16TH ASHADHA, 1945
¶5
TR.P(C) NO. 210 OF 2023
¶6
A.S.NO.7/2023 OF SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
¶7
PETITIONERS/APPELLENTS:
¶8
1GEETHA PRAKASH,
W/ O LATE PRAKASHKUMAR,
AGED 57 YEARS, POTTAKKAL HOUSE,
KARADI KARA, RAROTH VILLAGE,
THAMARASSERY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT- 673573
2KIREN PRAKASH,
S/O. LATE PRAKASHKUMAR,
AGED 33 YEARS, POTTAKKAL HOUSE,
KARADI KARA, RAROTH VILLAGE,
THAMARASSERY TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT - 673573
3ARUN PRAKASH
S/O. LATE PRAKASHKUMAR,
AGED 31 YEARS, POTTAKKAL HOUSE,
KARADI KARA, RAROTH VILLAGE,
THAMARASSERY TALUK, KOZHIKODU DISTRICT - 673573
BY ADVS.
K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER
T.K.SREEKALA
S.PARVATHI
¶9
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 15 AND 18 TO 27 IN AS:
¶10
1 SANTHA W/O. BHUVANACHANDRAN, POTTAKKAL HOUSE, PERUMBAVOOR KARA, PERUMBAVOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM- 683 542
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
GEETHA PRAKASH AND ORS.
- respondent
SANTHA W/O. BHUVANACHANDRAN AND ORS.
Coram
AI extract
P.SOMARAJAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court