Allowed
Suhara K. v. E.K.Alavikutty
Kerala HCTr.P(C)/171/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Single Judge transfer petition regarding matrimonial disputes. Court transferred Family Court Odisha case due to husband's advanced age and travel convenience between petitioner's residence and Ottapalam.
What did the court decide?
Transfer of O.P.No.994/2022 from Family Court, Tirur to Family Court, Ottapalam and withdrawal of original case.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
¶4
FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 16TH ASHADHA, 1945
TR.P(C) NO. 171 OF 2023
¶5
O.P.NO.994/2022 OF FAMILY COURT, TIRUR
¶6
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
¶7
SUHARA K.,
AGED 56 YEARS,
D/O K.T. MUMMY,
KURUPPATHODI VEEDU,
SANKARAMANGALAM P.O.,
PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT – 679 303
¶8
BY ADVS.
C.DINESH
RESHMI VIJU
¶9
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
¶10
E.K.ALAVIKUTTY,
AGED 74 YEARS,
S/O MUHAMMED, EDATHOLA POTTASSERY,
KANNAMANGALAM WEST P.O.,
THIRURANGADI TALUK,
KANNAMANGALAM VILLAGE,
MALAPPURAM DISTRICT – 676 305
¶11
BY ADVS.
PREMCHAND R. NAIR
GEORGE BRISTON
V.P.PRASANTH
PREEJA V.P.
VARSHA S.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether a divorce decree operation against the husband should be transferred for trial convenience.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
SUHARA K.
Coram
AI extract
P. SOMARAJAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court