Kurian v. Julie
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petition challenging a Family Court order dismissing a maintenance application filed under Section 125 CrPC. The petition was dismissed as abated because the petitioner died.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 18TH KARTHIKA, 1945
RPFC NO. 401 OF 2014
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT MC 393/2012 OF FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR
REVISION PETITIONER/S:
KURIAN AGED 64 YEARS, KODIYATH HOUSE, S/O SAKKARIYA, CHIYYARAM P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT PIN 680026.
BY ADV SRI.C.A.ANOOP
RESPONDENT/S:
1 JULIE, AGED 36 YEARS W/O PAULSON, KIZHAKOODAN(H), P.O.THALORE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN 680030
2 LINTA, AGED 30 YEARS W/O.SAJEEVAN,MULLAYIL(H),NATTIKA.P.O,THRISSUR DISTRICT,PIN-680566.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KURIAN
- respondent
JULIE
- respondent
LINTA
- respondent
DAYANA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court