Binukumar.J v. Linshimol
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed a revision petition challenging an allowance maintenance order. The bench affirmed the Family Court's finding that the wife was not living in adultery and upheld the maintenance quantum, finding the petition lacked merit.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
RP(FC) No.249 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 18TH KARTHIKA, 1945
RPFC NO. 249 OF 2016
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT MC 490/2015 OF FAMILY COURT,
NEDUMANGAD
REVISION PETITIONER/S:
BINUKUMAR.J
AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH, PADAPPARATHALAKKAL MELE
PUTHEN VEEDU, KURUTHAMCODE P.O., KULATHUMMAL
VILLAGE.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a wife disentitled from maintenance if living in adultery requires proof beyond bare assertion.
Whether the Family Court committed illegality in fixing maintenance quantum at Rs.7,000 and Rs.2,000.
Whether the revision petition is maintainable under Sec.19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1964.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Binukumar.J
- respondent
Linshimol
- respondent
Athulya L.B.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court