Disposed

Manager. v. Muhammed Haneesh

Kerala HC24 Jan 2023Con.Case(C)/32/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this contempt case, the Court notes that the petitioner's application was considered by the 1st respondent pursuant to previous directions, resulting in an order dated 19.10.2022, and closes the present application reserving the petitioner's right to challenge such order.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed; petitioner's right to challenge the order dated 19.10.2022 reserved.

Manager. Vs Muhammed Haneesh — Kerala HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CON.CASE(C) NO. 32 OF 2023

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

¶6

TUESDAY, THE 24^TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 4TH MAGHA, 1944

¶7

CON.CASE(C) NO. 32 OF 2023

¶8

JUDGMENT DATED 22.07.2022 IN WP(C) 23824/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

¶9

PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN W.P.(C):

¶10

MANAGER MOULANA COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION TEACHER TRAINING INSTITUTE, KUTTAYI, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676562

¶11

BY ADVS. M.A.FAYAZ C.B.ABHINAVA M.VISHNUPRIYA

¶12

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 AND 3 IN W.P.(C):

¶13

1 MUHAMMED HANEESH

¶14

AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695001

¶15

2 K.P.RAMESH KUMAR AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER

¶16

CON.CASE(C) NO. 32 OF 2023 2

¶17

O/O THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, MALAPPURAM MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676519

¶18

SRI T.R RENJITH, SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶19

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.01.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶20

CON.CASE(C) NO. 32 OF 2023 3

¶21

JUDGMENT

¶22

When this Contempt Case is taken up for consideration, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that in terms of the directions issued, the application filed by the petitioner was considered by the 1st respondent and order dated 19.10.2022 has been issued.

¶23

Reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge the order, if he is in any way aggrieved, this Contempt Case is closed.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

¶26

JUDGE

¶27

IAP

¶28

CON.CASE(C) NO. 32 OF 2023 4

¶29

APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 32/2023

¶30

PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:

¶31

Annexure1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P(C)NO.23824/2022 DATED 22.07.2022. Annexure2 TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER'S COUNSEL DATED 29.07.2022. Annexure3 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD RECEIVED FROM THE RESPONDENTS. Annexure4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.D3/188/ 2022/G.EDN DATED 05.09.2022.

Manager. v. Muhammed Haneesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manager. v. Muhammed Haneesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Navamukunda Higher Secondary School Vs State of Kerala

Unais.P.P Vs Director of General Education

Silja K.P Vs the Director of General Education

Jafar Abdul Samad Vs the Regional Passport Officer

Bibitha Bhasi Rep. by Poa Holder Bhanu Bhasi Vs Union of India, Represented by the Secretary to Government

Shahul Hameed .K.P. Vs the Secretary