Unnikrishnan.M.P v. Sandeep Biswas
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt case, the Kerala High Court disposed of the petition by dismissing it. The court held that the petitioner's entitlement to higher pension requires reconsideration by the Employees Provident Fund Organisation based on the Supreme Court judgment dated 04.11.2022.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case dismissed; entitlement to higher pension to be reconsidered by EPFO.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023/12TH ASWINA, 1945
CON.CASE(C)NO.2647 OF 2019
ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 25.02.2019 IN
WP(C)NO.16189 OF 2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER NO.163:
UNNIKRISHNAN M.P., AGED 56 YEARS
S/O. (LATE) M. K. PADMANABHAN, OFFICER, THE
MALAYALA MANORAMA CO. LTD., K. K. ROAD, KOTTAYAM -
686 001, PF A/C NO.KR/KTM/71/2999, RESIDING AT
AISWARYA, PADIVATTOM, SURABHI ROAD, EDAPPALLY P.
O., KOCHI - 24.
BY ADV P.N.MOHANAN
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's entitlement to disbursement of higher pension requires reconsideration in light of the Apex Court judgment dated 04.11.2022.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Unnikrishnan M.P.
- respondent
Sandeep Biswas
Coram
Anil K. Narendran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court