Raveendran Nair N. v. Shri.Sandeep Biswas
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt case, the High Court closed the petition filed for violation of directions regarding higher pension. The court held that entitlement must be reconsidered by the EPFO in light of the Supreme Court judgment in Employees Provident Fund Organisation v. Sunil Kumar B., without adversely affecting the respondent's right to review.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed without prejudice to the Right of the respondent to reconsider entitlement in light of the Supreme Court judgment.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023/12TH ASWINA, 1945
CON.CASE(C)NO.2383 OF 2019
ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 26.02.2019 IN
WP(C)NO.3530 OF 2019 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:
1 RAVEENDRAN NAIR N., AGED 72 YEARS S/O.PADMANABHAN PILLAI, KAVIL HOUSE, MUNDAKKAYAM ESTATE NO.1, MUNDAKKAYAM, KOTTAYAM, P.F.A/C.NO.KR/1911/130, P.P.O.NO.KR/KTM/11462.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners' claim for higher pension entitlement stands closed in view of the Supreme Court judgment in Civil Appeal Nos. 8143-44 of 2022.
Whether the Employees Provident Fund Organisation is required to reconsider the petitioners' eligibility for disbursement of higher pension.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raveendran Nair N. and others
- respondent
Sandeep Biswas
Coram
Anil K. Narendran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court