Aleyamma A.K v. Sunil Barthwal
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition alleging disobedience of 2018 directions regarding pension was closed. The court directed reconsideration of entitlement based on a 2022 Supreme Court judgment validating specific EGFR notification provisions and extending option exercise periods.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE SOPHY THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2023/11TH ASWINA, 1945
CON.CASE(C)NO.173 OF 2020
ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 12.10.2018 IN
WP(C)NO.33244 OF 2016 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS 23, 38 & 39:
1 ALEYAMMA A.K, AGED 60 YEARS, D/O.PHILIPOSE KORAH, PF NO.KR/KTM/10048/219, KOCHUCHALATHU HOUSE, VADAVATHOOR P.O, KALATHIPADY, KOTTAYAM686010
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Contempt Petition for willful disobedience of High Court directions should be disposed of in light of the Supreme Court's subsequent judgment clarifying provision interpretations.
Whether the petitioners are entitled to reconsideration of pension disbursement following the Apex Court's amended directions.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Aleyamma A.K., Arya Sringan B., Sivadathan Pillai G.
- respondent
Sunil Barthwal, Sandeep Biswas (for Employees Provident Fund Organisation)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court