In a contempt of court case filed by surviving family members seeking libe to withdraw the case with liberty to avoid pension entitlement issues. The court granted the liberty and dismissed the contempt petition as withdrawn.
Liberty granted to approach appropriate authorities; Contempt case dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 3RD SRAVANA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 243 OF 2013
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WPC 33752/2011 OF
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONERS:
1O THANKACHAN
AGED 62 YEARS
S/O. LATE UMMUNNI KOZHY,
RESIDING AT KAVUMKAL PUTHEN VEEDU,
VAVOLIKANDOM.P.O., KUMPATHAMOM,
VADASSERIKKARA,
PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689662.
(PERSONAL NO. 45197)
2LEELAMMA
W/O. LATE A.K. JOHNKUTTY,
ANIL BHAVANAM, KIZHAKKETHERUVE,
KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691542,
NOW RESIDING AT CRRA HOUSE NO.6,
CHALAKUZHI ROAD, PATTAM.P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
(PERSONAL NO. OF LATE A.K. JOHNKUTTY-03714)
BY ADVS.
SRI.RINNY STEPHEN CHAMAPARAMPIL
SMT.ASHA ELIZABETH MATHEW
RESPONDENTS:
1MALAY CHATTERJEE
CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR,
HINDUSTAN STEEL WORKS CONSTRUCTION LTD.
5/1, COMMISSARIATE ROAD, HASTINGS,
KOLKATA, WEST BENGA-700022.
2
Con.Case(C) No.243 of 2013
2P.K. MISHRA
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER,
D.K. BLOCK, SALT LAKE CITY, KOLKATTA,
WEST BENGAL-700091.
BY ADVS.
SRI.T.SANJAY, CGC
SRI.N.N. SUGUNAPALAN, SC, P.F.
SRI.T.SANJAY CGC
SRI.N.N. SUGUNAPALAN, SC, P.F.
SMT.T.N.GIRIJA SCEPF ORGANISATION
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP
FOR ADMISSION ON 25.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
Con.Case(C) No.243 of 2013
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 25th day of July, 2023
Counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents have taken a contention that the 2nd petitioner is not entitled to pension as the deceased had not joined Family Pension Scheme. The petitioners seek leave to withdraw the Contempt of Court Case with liberty to approach appropriate authorities or take appropriate proceedings for receiving the family pension.
Granting such liberty, the Contempt of Court Case is
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
N.NAGARESH
JUDGE
spk
Thankachan
Leelamma
Malay Chatterjee
P.K. Mishra
N. Nagares
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court