Disposed

Thankamani Das, v. P.Vishnu Raj IAS

Kerala HC24 Jul 2023Con.Case(C)/590/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a contempt of court case regarding a previous judgment in W.P.(C) No.28243 of 2020. Both counsel submitted that the directions in that judgment were complied with. The court accepted the submissions and closed the contempt case with no substantive decision or proposition of law.

What did the court decide?

Contempt of Court case closed due to compliance with previous order.

Thankamani Das, Vs P.Vishnu Raj IAS — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

¶4

MONDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 2ND SRAVANA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 590 OF 2022

¶5

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT WP(C) 28243/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:

¶6

THANKAMANI DAS,
AGED 58 YEARS
W/O MOHANDAS, KIZHAKKEVELIKKAKATH HOUSE,
PADIVATTOM, EDAPPALLY, KOCHI, PIN – 682 024.

¶7

BY ADVS.
P.MARTIN JOSE
P.PRIJITH
THOMAS P.KURUVILLA
MANJUNATH MENON
ANNA LINDA V.J
R.GITHESH
HARIKRISHNAN S.

¶8

RESPONDENT:

¶9

P.VISHNU RAJ IAS,
FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI,
PIN – 682 001.

¶10

BY ADV
DEEPA N -SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶11

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 24.07.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:

¶12

Con.Case (C) No.590 of 2022

¶13

¶14

JUDGMENT

¶15

Dated this the 24 th day of July, 2023

¶16

Counsel on either side submit that the directions

¶17

contained in the judgment dated 10.0 9.2021 in W.P.(C) No.28243 of 2020 stand complied with and therefore no further orders are required in the Contempt of Court Case.

¶18

Recording the said submission, the Contempt of Court

¶19

Case is closed.

¶20

Sd/N .NAGARESH JUDGE

¶21

AMR

¶22

Con.Case (C) No.590 of 2022

¶23

¶24

APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 590/2022

¶25

PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES

¶26

Annexure1TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 17-03-2020
ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.
Annexure llTRUE COPY OF TREASURY CHALLAN DATED 19-
03-2020.
Annexure lllTRUE COPY OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02-06-2020
OF THE RESPONDENT.
Annexure lVTRUE COPY OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 08-09-2020
OF THE TAHSILDAR.
Annexure VTRUE COPY OF NOTIFIED FAIR VALUE FOR
SY.NO.38/1 IN ELOOR VILLAGE.
Annexure VITRUE COPY OF NOTIFIED FAIR VALUE FOR
SY.NO.37/10 IN ELOOR VILLAGE.
AnnexureVIITRUE COPY OF G.O.(P) NO.188/2014/TD DATED
14-11-2014.

¶27

AnnexureVIIICERTIFIED COPY JUDGMENT DATED 10-09-2021
IN W.P. ( C) NO. 28243 OF 2020 OF THIS
HON'BLE COURT.
AnnexureIXTRUE COPY OF RECEIPT DATED 11-10-2021
ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE RESPONDENT
ACKNOWLEDGE THE RECEIPT OF ANNEXURE.VIII
JUDGMENT.

¶28

RESPONDENT’S ANNEXURES

¶29

Annexure R1(a)True copy of Order No.K4/1183/2018 dated
05.11.2019.
Annexure R1(b)True copy of Order No.RDOCHN/7/2021/K4
dated 11.11.2022.

Thankamani Das, v. P.Vishnu Raj IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thankamani Das, v. P.Vishnu Raj IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Parvathy.a. Vs Peethambara Kurup

George Pathrose Vs Vishnu Raj. P. IAS

Khadeeja Vs Secretary

Jayasree P, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Johny Vs State of Kerala

Jayadevan Vs the District Collector