Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant appeared absent and made no representation. No substantive adjudication on merits was delivered.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2023 / 15TH JYAISHTA, 1945
AS NO. 120 OF 2000
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 1.9.99 IN I.A NO.988/98 IN O.S 348/92 OF THE SUB COURT, MAVELIKARA
PETITIONER/2ND CR.PETITIONER/2ND PLAINTIFF
K.R.ANANDA VALLYAMMA,'SABARIGIRI', CHIRAKADAVOM MURI, KAYAMKULAM VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADV DR.P.S.KRISHNA PILLAI
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/CLAIMANT:
V.K.MURALEEDHARAN NAIR
OTTELEZHATHU VEETTIL, KANNUKATTUSSERY, VAIKOM. BY ADVS.
SRI.DALE P.KURIEN
THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 05.06.2023,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Sathish Ninan, J.
==============================
A.S No.120 of 2000
========================== Dated this the 5th day of June, 2023
JUDGMENT
The case was included in the advance list published on 11.05.2023 as item No.1024. Today the case is published in the daily hearing list as item No.501. There has been no representation from the side of the appellant so far. Appellant called, absent. Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
Sathish Ninan, Judge
vdv
K.R.Ananda Vallyamma
V.K.Muraleedharan Nair
Sathish Ninan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
