Dismissed

R.Moorthy v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC10 Nov 2022WP(C)/5859/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court closed a writ petition filed by a PWD contractor as infructuous, relying on counsel's submission that the granted relief was no longer necessary.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's counsel submitted prayers were infructuous; court closed the petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 10THDAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 19TH KARTHIKA,1944
WP(C) NO. 5859 OF 2018

¶5

PETITIONER/S:

¶6

R.MOORTHY
S/O. RAMASWAMI KOUNDER,CLASS A PWD CONTRACTOR,
CHEERAKKADAVU, PUDUR (P.O) ATTAPADI, AGALI,
PALAKKAD 678 581.

¶7

BY ADV SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN

¶8

RESPONDENT/S:

¶9

1STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
FOREST AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
2THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER
MANNARKKAD DIVISION, FOREST DEPARTMENT,
MANNARKKAD 678 581.
3SRI.BOBBY SEBASTIAN
PWD CONTRACTOR, VALUVETTIKKAL HOUSE,
KELAKAM (PO),KANNUR 670 674.
4SRI. T.M SHEJEEB, THENNALIL HOUSE
PEZHAKKAPPILLY P.O, MUVATTUPUZHA,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 686 673.
BY ADVS.
SRI.SANDESH RAJA.K., SPL. G.P. (FOREST)
SRI.ABRAHAM P.GEORGE
SMT.M.D.BEENA
SRI.JOHNY THOMAS
SRI.K.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
SMT.SATHYASHREE PRIYA EASWARAN
SMT.M.SANTHY

¶10

R.Moorthy Vs State of Kerala — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Kerala HC (2022)

¶27

`EXHIBIT P1`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE LICENSE DATED 14-05-2013` `ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE ROADS AND` `BRIDGES DIVISION OF PWD.`
`EXHIBIT P2`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE E-TENDER NOTICE WITH` `RELEVANT PAGES OF THE TENDER DOCUMENT ISSUED BY` `THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 27-10-2017.`
`EXHIBIT P3A`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE BOQ STATEMENT IN RESPECT OF` `ITEM NO.3 OF EXHIBIT P2.`
`EXHIBIT P3(A)`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE BOQ STATEMENT IN RESPECT OF` `ITEM NO. 4 OF EXHIBIT P2.`
`EXHIBIT P3(B)`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE BOQ STATEMENT IN RESPECT OF` `ITEM NO. 5 OF EXHIBIT P2.`
`EXHIBIT P3(C)`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE BOQ STATEMENT IN RESPECT OF` `ITEM NO. 6 OF EXHIBIT P2.`
`EXHIBIT P4`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B-5692/17 DATED` `01-01-2018 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO` `RESPONDENT NO.3.`
`EXHIBIT P4(A)`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B-5395/17 DATED` `01-01-2018 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO` `RESPONDENT NO.3.`
`EXHIBIT P4(B)`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B-5691/17 DATED` `01-01-2018 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO` `RESPONDENT NO.3.`

¶30

`EXHIBIT P4(C)`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B-5399/17 DATED` `16-01-2018 ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT TO` `RESPONDENT NO.4.`
`EXHIBIT P5`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 08-02-2018` `SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE SECOND` `RESPONDENT.`
`RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS`
`EXHIBIT R2(A)`	`TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.B2-1790/14/ITDP DATED` `01.12.2016 OF DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD.`
`EXHIBIT R2(B)`	`TRUE COPY OF THE GO(P)NO.124/2016/FIN. DATED` `29.8.2016.`
`EXHIBIT R2(C)`	`TRUE COPY OF RATE QUOTED IN E-TENDERING.`
`EXHIBIT R2(D)`	`TRUE COPY OF E-TENDER NOTIFICATION.`
`EXHIBIT R3(A)`	`TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE TENDER` `NOTIFICATION NO. B-7351/2017 DATED 27.10.2017` `ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT R3(B)`	`TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. B-5692/17 DATED` `01.01.2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT R3(C)`	`TRUE COPY OF THE SUMMARY DETAILS OF THE BILL OF` `QUANTITIES(BOQ) ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT R3(D)`	`TRUE COPY OF ORDER NO. B-5395/17 DATED` `01.01.2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT R3(E)`	`TRUE COPY OF THE SUMMARY DETAILS OF THE BILL OF` `QUANTITIES(BOQ) ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT R3(F)`	`TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO. B-5691/17 DATED` `01.01.2018 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT R3(G)`	`TRUE COPY OF THE SUMMARY DETAILS OF THE BILL OF` `QUANTITIES(BOQ) ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.`

R.Moorthy v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Abdurehiman Puzhakkalakath Vs State of Kerala

Bijulal D Vs the Deputy Superintendent of Police

M/S.Priyanka Motors Vs the Child Development Project Officer

The Thanbeehul Islam Higher Secondary School Vs State of Kerala

R.Moorthy v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Abdurehiman Puzhakkalakath Vs State of Kerala

Bijulal D Vs the Deputy Superintendent of Police

M/S.Priyanka Motors Vs the Child Development Project Officer

The Thanbeehul Islam Higher Secondary School Vs State of Kerala

A compact analysis

Coram

Biji Venugopal, Vs State of Kerala

M/S. Cochin Steel Industrial Complex Vs Kerala Water Authority