K.Subramonia Iyer v. Trivandrum Corporation
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous when taken up on the date of hearing, without addressing the substantive relief sought.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022/7TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 4460 OF 2013
PETITIONER:
K.SUBRAMONIA IYER TC 40/1610, PUTHEN THERUV, MANACAUD, TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADVS.SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL
RESPONDENTS:
1 TRIVANDRUM CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE, PALAYAM, TRIVANDRUM-695001.
2 V.SHYLAJA T.C.40/1608 & 1608(1), VIJAYA BHAVAN, HOUSE NO.65, MSNRA, MANACAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
R1 BY ADV.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY R2 BY ADV.SRI.S.RAKESH
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28.11.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C.) No. 4460/2013 2
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the
following relief:-
“ i. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondents to call for the records pertaining to Ext.P4 order and to quash the same. ”
for the petitioner, Sri. R. Sunilkumar submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY
JUDGE
DCS/28.11.2022
K.Subramonia Iyer
Trivandrum Corporation
V.Shylaja
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court