Benny v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner's applications for renewal of vehicle permit and fitness were rejected due to blacklisting. The Court removed the blacklisting and directed the authorities to consider the applications.
What did the court decide?
Blacklisting of the vehicle was removed and the petitioner's applications for renewal of permit and fitness were ordered to be considered expeditiously.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 22ND MAGHA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 3373 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
BENNY AGED 47 YEARS S/O JOSEPH, RESIDING AT KUZHIMATTATHIL HOUSE, KAVILAMPARA VEETTIL, KARINGAD.P.O, CALICUT-673513.
BY ADV C.Y.VINOD KUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
- 2 REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MINI CIVIL STATION, VADAKARA, CALICUT-673104.REPRESENTED BY REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER.
- 3 SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, SRTO OFFICE, PERAMBRA, CALICUT-673525.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the blacklisting of the petitioner's vehicle should be lifted to allow his applications for renewal of permit and fitness to be considered.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BENNY
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
SATHISH NINAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court