Postal, v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Review Petitioner contended the previous judgment was a clerical error regarding relief confinement. The court allowed the review, recalled the judgment, and restored the writ petition to the file for proper disposal.
What did the court decide?
Review petition allowed; judgment dated 07.12.2021 recalled; writ petition restored to file.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 21ST MAGHA, 1943
RP NO. 127 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 11363/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
POSTAL, TELECOM BSNL EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. 1940, GANDHARIAMMAN KOVIL ROAD, MELE, THAMPANOOR JUNCTION, SANTHI NAGAR, PULIMOODU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
BY ADV M.SASINDRAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION, DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, ASHOKA ROAD, SANCHAR BHAVAN, NEW DELHI 110 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim order passed reserves or disposes of the merits in the writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Postal, Telecom BSNL Employees Co-Operative Society Ltd.
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
Controller of Communications
- respondent
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
- respondent
Pankajakshan V
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court