Remanded

Sansco Technologies Kerala Pvt. .Ltd, v. Sojan Mathew

Kerala HC14 Jul 2022WP(C)/13148/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala, in a batch of writ petitions, set aside orders passed by the Deputy Labour Commissioner granting subsistence allowance. The court held that the impugned orders were flawed due to non-application of mind, lack of hearing on jurisdiction based on the definition of 'employee', and mechanical passing, remitting the matter for fresh consideration with an opportunity of hearing

What did the court decide?

Impugned orders dated 18.03.2022 quashed; matter remitted to the authority to consider afresh after affording opportunity of hearing to both parties.

Sansco Technologies Kerala Pvt. .Ltd, Vs Sojan Mathew — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 23RD ASHADHA, 1944

¶5

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022

¶6

PETITIONER

¶7

SANSCO TECHNOLOGIES KERALA PVT .LTD,
(FORMERLY OPPO ELECTRONICS KERALA PVT. LTD.), BANERJI
ROAD, (67/6446), NEAR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-
682031, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, DIMPLE M.

¶8

BY ADVS.
E.K.NANDAKUMAR (SR.)
M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
K.JOHN MATHAI
JOSON MANAVALAN
PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM
KURYAN THOMAS
RAJA KANNAN

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1 SOJAN MATHEW VATTAKATTU HOUSE, VELIYANADU P.O., ERNAKULAM-682313.

¶11

2 THE DEPUTY LABOUR OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANADU-682030.

¶12

3 THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANADU-682030.

¶13

GP SRI JIMMY GEORGE

¶14

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.07.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).13103/2022, 13192/2022 AND CONNECTED
CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶16

¶17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶18

PRESENT

¶19

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶20

THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 23RD ASHADHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 13103 OF 2022

¶21

PETITIONER:

¶22

SANSCO TECHNOLOGIES KERALA PVT LTD
(FORMERLY OPPO ELECTRONICS KERALA PVT LTD)
BANERJI ROAD, (67/6446)
NEAR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, DIMPLE M

¶23

BY ADVS.
M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
K.JOHN MATHAI
JOSON MANAVALAN
KURYAN THOMAS
PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM
RAJA KANNAN

¶24

RESPONDENTS:

¶25

1 ELDO VARGHESE THONATTU HOUSE, MAMALA P.O, KOCHI 682 305

¶26

2 THE DEPUTY LABOUR OFFICER OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANADU 682 030

¶27

3 THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANADU, 682 030

¶28

GP SRI JIMMY GEORGE

¶29

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.07.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).13148/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶30

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶31

¶32

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶33

PRESENT

¶34

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶35

THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 23RD ASHADHA, 1944

¶36

WP(C) NO. 13192 OF 2022

¶37

PETITIONER:

¶38

SANSCO TECHNOLOGIES KERALA PVT LTD
(FORMERLY OPPO ELECTRONICS KERALA PVT (LTD), BANERJI
ROAD, (67/6446),
NEAR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682031,
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, DIMPLE M.

¶39

BY ADVS.
E.K.NANDAKUMAR (SR.)
M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
K.JOHN MATHAI
JOSON MANAVALAN
KURYAN THOMAS
PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM
RAJA KANNAN

¶40

RESPONDENTS:

¶41

1 HARIDAS R NEELAKANDAVILASAM HOUSE, THRIKKARIYOOR P.O, KOTHAMANGALAM - 686692.

¶42

2 THE DEPUTY LABOUR OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANADU - 682030.

¶43

3 THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANADU - 682030.

¶44

GP SRI JIMMY GEORGE

¶45

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.07.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).13148/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶46

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶47

4

¶48

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶49

PRESENT

¶50

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶51

THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 23RD ASHADHA, 1944

¶52

WP(C) NO. 13215 OF 2022

¶53

PETITIONER:

¶54

SANSCO TECHNOLOGIES KERALA PVT. LTD.,
(FORMERLY OPPO ELECTRONICS KERALA PVT. LTD.), BANERJI
ROAD, (67/6646),
NEAR HIGHCOURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031,
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, DIMPLE.M.

¶55

BY ADVS.
E.K.NANDAKUMAR (SR.)
M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
K.JOHN MATHAI
JOSON MANAVALAN
KURYAN THOMAS
PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM
RAJA KANNAN

¶56

RESPONDENTS:

¶57

1 ANTONY JOFIN, PERUMPILLIL HOUSE, ELAMAKKARA P.O., SAGAMAM LANE, KOCHI-682 026.

¶58

2 THE DEPUTY LABOUR OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANADU-682 030.

¶59

3 THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, CIVIL STATIN, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANADU-682 030.

¶60

GP SRI JIMMY GEORGE

¶61

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.07.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).13148/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶62

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶63

5

¶64

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶65

PRESENT

¶66

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶67

THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 23RD ASHADHA, 1944

¶68

WP(C) NO. 13612 OF 2022

¶69

PETITIONER:

¶70

SANSCO TECHNOLOGIES KERALA PRIVATE LIMITED
(FORMERLY OPPO ELECTRONICS KERALA PVT LTD),
BANERJI ROAD, (67/6446),
NEAR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682031,
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, DIMPLE M.

¶71

BY ADVS.
E.K.NANDAKUMAR (SR.)
M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
K.JOHN MATHAI
JOSON MANAVALAN
KURYAN THOMAS
PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM
RAJA KANNAN

¶72

RESPONDENTS:

¶73

1 ANAS P.M. POONAKUDIYIL HOUSE, MANIKKINAR P.O, VALACHIRA, KOTHAMANGALAM - 685593.

¶74

2 THE DEPUTY LABOUR OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANADU – 682030.

¶75

3 THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANADU - 682030.

¶76

GP SRI JIMMY GEORGE

¶77

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.07.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).13148/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶78

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶79

6

¶80

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶81

PRESENT

¶82

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶83

THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 23RD ASHADHA, 1944

¶84

WP(C) NO. 13535 OF 2022

¶85

PETITIONER:

¶86

SANSCO TECHNOLOGIES KERALA PRIVATE LIMITED,
(FORMERLY OPPO ELECTRONICS KERALA PVT LTD),
BANERJI ROAD (67/6446),
NEAR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031,
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, DIMPLE.M.

¶87

BY ADVS.
E.K.NANDAKUMAR (SR.)
K.JOHN MATHAI
JOSON MANAVALAN
KURYAN THOMAS
PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM
RAJA KANNAN
M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR

¶88

RESPONDENTS:

¶89

1 SRI. MUHAMMED AFSAL.P. PALLIKKATTIL HOUSE, AZAD NAGAR, MULLAMPARA, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM 676 121.

¶90

2 THE DEPUTY LABOUR OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANAD 682 030.

¶91

3 THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANADU 682 030.

¶92

GP SRI JIMMY GEORGE

¶93

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.07.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).13148/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶94

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶95

¶96

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶97

PRESENT

¶98

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶99

THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 23RD ASHADHA, 1944

¶100

WP(C) NO. 13414 OF 2022

¶101

PETITIONER:

¶102

SANSCO TECHNOLOGIES KERALA PVT.LTD,
(FORMERLY OPPO ELECTRONICS KERALA PVT. LTD.) BANERJI
ROAD, (67/6446),
NEAR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031,
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, DIMPLE M.

¶103

BY ADVS.
E.K.NANDAKUMAR (SR.)
M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
K.JOHN MATHAI
JOSON MANAVALAN
RAJA KANNAN
PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM
KURYAN THOMAS

¶104

RESPONDENTS:

¶105

1 SRI.JITTO JOHN, VANDANATHIL HOUSE, PONJASSERY P.O., PERUMPAVOOR-683 547.

¶106

2 THE DEPUTY LABOUR OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANADU-682 030.

¶107

3 THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANADU-682 030.

¶108

GP SRI JIMMY GEORGE

¶109

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.07.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).13148/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶110

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶111

¶112

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶113

PRESENT

¶114

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

¶115

THURSDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 23RD ASHADHA, 1944

¶116

WP(C) NO. 13548 OF 2022

¶117

PETITIONER:

¶118

SANSCO TECHNOLGIES KERALA PVT.LTD
(FORMERLY OPPO ELECTRONICS KERALA PVT. LTD.), BANERJI
ROAD, (67/6446),
NEAR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031,
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, DIMPLE M.

¶119

BY ADVS.
E.K.NANDAKUMAR (SR.)
M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR
K.JOHN MATHAI
JOSON MANAVALAN
KURYAN THOMAS
PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM
RAJA KANNAN

¶120

RESPONDENTS:

¶121

1SANEESH P.M.
PANIKKASSERY HOUSE, CHALAKUDY P.O.,
THRISSUR-680307.

¶122

2 THE DEPUTY LABOUR OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANADU-682030.

¶123

3 THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, CIVIL STATION, ERNAKULAM, KAKKANADU, 682030.

¶124

GP SRI JIMMY GEORGE

¶125

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.07.2022, ALONG WITH WP(C).13148/2022 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE
COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶126

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶127

¶128

JUDGMENT

¶129

[WP(C) Nos.13148/2022, 13103/2022, 13192/2022, 13215/2022, 13612/2022, 13535/2022, 13414/2022, 13548/2022]

¶130

Orders dated 18.03.2022 of the Deputy Labour Commissioner, Ernakulam/Authority under the Kerala Payment of Subsistence Allowance Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 1972 Act’, for short) ordering the petitioner management to pay the subsistence allowance for the period 09.09.2020 to 07.12.2020 in respect of the claims set up by the private respondents in each case, are under challenge.

¶131

The facts in brief are that the petitioner is a private limited company engaged in the business of distribution of mobile and its accessories under the brand name 'Oppo'. As per the contention, the private respondents were employed with the petitioner in different posts of Sales Executive, Assistant Manager etc. On account of certain acts and omissions on their part, disciplinary action was initiated against them by issuing show cause notice dated 09.09.2020 Ext.P1 along with suspension. The domestic enquiry was conducted which resulted into termination.

¶132

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶133

10

¶134

Mr.Nandakumar, learned Senior Counsel assisted by

¶135

Mr.Jayamohan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that on receipt of the notice in respect of the complaint preferred by the private respondents on the authority under the payment subsistence allowance, petitioner management had taken a categorical reply of jurisdiction for the reason that the nature and duties of the private respondents were of managerial which would not fall within the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(a) of the 1972 Act. There is no whisper in that regard in the orders much less any opportunity of hearing was given and therefore there is fallacy and opaqueness in the orders.

¶136

There is no representation despite service of notice on behalf of the private respondents. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and appraised the paper books.

¶137

It would be apt to reproduce the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(a) of the 1972 Act.

¶138

“2.(a)“employee” means any person employed in or in connection with the work of any establishment to do skilled, semi-skilled or unskilled manual, supervisory, technical, clerical or any other kind of work for hire or

¶139

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶140

¶141

reward, whether the terms of employment be express or implied, but does not include any such person who is employed mainly in a managerial or an administrative capacity or as an out-worker, that is to say, a person to whom any articles or materials are given out by or on behalf of the employer to be cleaned, washed, altered, ornamented or repaired by such out-worker in any place not under the control and management of the employer;

¶142

On perusal of the impugned orders, it is evident that there is no notice or opportunity of hearing or any advertance to the objections qua the jurisdiction as to whether the private respondents would be falling under the provisions of the definitions of 'employee' entitling for subsistence allowance under the particular provisions of the Act. It has been further contended that the termination order is also stated to be under challenge as during the interregnum, summons of the same has been received. Be that as it may. Perusal of the orders reveal non application of mind, rather the order has been passed in a most mechanical and cavalier manner. Authorities at the helm of affairs are expected to consider all the objections raised by the respective parties including the provisions of law as and when any objections with

¶143

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶144

¶145

regard to the jurisdiction or maintainability is raised.

¶146

For the reason aforementioned, the impugned orders dated 18.03.2022 are set aside. Writ petitions are allowed. Matter is remitted to the authority to consider afresh by affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the private respondents. Both the parties are entitled to place on record additional material, if any. Parties though their counsel are directed to appear before the competent authority on 02.08.2022 at 10 A.M.

Sd/-

AMIT RAWAL JUDGE

nak

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶151

¶152

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13103/2022

¶153

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

¶154

Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED
09-09-2020

¶155

Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DATED 12-09-
2020 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT

¶156

Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 28-01-
2021 FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE
THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶157

Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT DATED 18-03-
2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

¶158

Exhibit P5TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD
RESPONDENT DATED 18-03-2022 IN SAC NO
2(E)/2021 ALONG WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION

¶159

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶160

¶161

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13192/2022

¶162

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

¶163

Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED
09.09.2020.
Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DATED
12.09.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST
RESPONDENT.

¶164

Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED
28.01.2021 FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶165

Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT DATED
18.03.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

¶166

Exhibit P5TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD
RESPONDENT DATED 18.03.2022 ALONG WITH
ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

¶167

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶168

¶169

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13215/2022

¶170

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

¶171

Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED
09.09.2020.

¶172

Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DATED
12.09.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST
RESPONDENT.

¶173

Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED
28.01.2021 FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶174

Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT DATED
18.03.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

¶175

Exhibit P5TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD
RESPONDENT DATED 18.03.2022 IN SAN
NO.2(D)/2021 ALONG WITH ENGLISH
TRANSLATION.

¶176

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶177

¶178

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13612/2022

¶179

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

¶180

Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED
09.09.2020.

¶181

Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DATED
12.09.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST
RESPONDENT.

¶182

Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED
28.01.2021 FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶183

Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT DATED
18.03.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.
Exhibit P5TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD
RESPONDENT DATED 18.03.2022 IN SAC NO.
2(F)/2021 ALONG WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

¶184

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶185

¶186

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13535/2022

¶187

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

¶188

Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED
09.09.2020.

¶189

Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DATED
12.09.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE IST
RESPONDENT.

¶190

Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED
28.01.2021 FILED BY THE IST RESPONDENT
BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶191

Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT DATED
18.03.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

¶192

Exhibit P5TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD
RESPONDENT DATED 18.03.2022 IN SAC NO. 2
(B) /2021 ALONG WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

¶193

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶194

¶195

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13414/2022

¶196

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

¶197

Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED
09.09.2020.
Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DATED
12.09.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST
RESPONDENT.

¶198

Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED
28.01.2021 FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶199

Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT DATED
18.03.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

¶200

Exhibit P5TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD
RESPONDENT DATED 18.03.2022 IN SAC
NO.2(H)/2021 ALONG WITH ENGLISH
TRANSLATION.

¶201

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶202

¶203

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13548/2022

¶204

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

¶205

Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED
9.9.2020.

¶206

Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DATED
12.9.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST
RESPONDENT.

¶207

Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED
28.1.2021 FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶208

Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT DATED
18.3.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

¶209

Exhibit P5TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD
RESPONDENT DATED 18.3.2022 IN SAC NO.
2(C)/2021 ALONG WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

¶210

WP(C) NO. 13148 OF 2022 & Conn. Cases

¶211

¶212

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13148/2022

¶213

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

¶214

Exhibit P1TRUE COPY OF THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED
9.9.2020.
Exhibit P2TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION DATED
12.9.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST
RESPONDENT.

¶215

Exhibit P3TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED
28.1.2021 FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

¶216

Exhibit P4TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT DATED
18.3.2021 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

¶217

Exhibit P5TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD
RESPONDENT DATED 18.3.2022 IN SAC
NO.2(J)/2021 ALONG WITH ENGLISH
TRANSLATION.

Sansco Technologies Kerala Pvt. .Ltd, v. Sojan Mathew

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sansco Technologies Kerala Pvt. .Ltd, v. Sojan Mathew

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mangalam Publications (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Kerala State Electricity Appellate Authority

Shyni. S Vs Maintenance Tribunal for the Welfare of Parents &Senior Citizens (Sub Divisional Magistrate),Kolla

Yousuf S.K. Vs the District Labour Officer

The Assistant Executive Engineer, Vs Consumer Grievance Reddressal Forum

Sansco Technologies Kerala Pvt. Ltd. Vs Eldo Varghese

Sansco Technologies Kerala Pvt. Ltd. Vs Haridas R