Bhaskaran v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition (WP(C) No. 1037 of 2019). The court granted the permission and dismissed the petition accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 1037 OF 2019
PETITIONER:
BHASKARAN POOVATHUMPARAMBU, UDYOGAMANDAL P.O., ERNAKULAM. BY ADV K.P.SANTHI
RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF MICRO SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISES, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI - 110 001. 2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 3 KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES COMMISSION STATE OFFICE, (KERALA), TRIVANDRUM - 695 001, REPRESENTED BY THE STATE DIRECTOR. 4 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ERNAKULAM - 682 030. 5 THA TAHSILDAR PARAVUR TALUK, PARAVUR, ERNAKULAM - 683 513. 6 THE VILLAGE OFFICER ELOOR VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM- 683 501. 7 MUPPATHADAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY REG.NO.ER/65/97, MUPPATHADAM POST, PARAVOOR, ALUVA - 683 110.
WP(C) NO. 1037 OF 2019
2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BHASKARAN POOVATHUMPARAMBU
- respondent
UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF MICRO SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISES
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES COMMISSION STATE OFFICE, (KERALA)
- respondent
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ERNAKULAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court