T.C. Rajesh v. Sreedharan
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed on merits as declared out of court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 31ST BHADRA,
1944
RCREV. NO. 293 OF 2016
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 20.07.2016 IN RCA NO.59 OF 2014 OF THE III RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY (DISTRICT COURT), TRICHUR FROM RCP NO.2 OF 2012 DATED 31.10.2013 RENT CONTROLLER, TRICHUR
REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
T.C. RAJESH, S/O.THEKKOOTT JANAKI AMMA, HOUSE NO.15/281, PUTHUR VILLAGE, P.O.PUTHUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.
SRI.T.M.CHANDRAN SRI.A.J.RAMAN SRI.S.SUJITH
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
SREEDHARAN,
AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.KUNJAN, MARAMKALAYIL HOUSE, P.O.KURIACHIRA, CHELAKOTTUKARA DESOM, OLLUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR-680006.
BY ADV SRI.RAJIT
THIS RENT CONTROL REVISION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.09.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RCR No.293 of 2016
2
P.B.SURESH KUMAR & MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, JJ.
R.C.R.No.293 of 2016
Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2022.
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
matter is settled out of court.
In the light of the submission made by the learned
counsel, the revision petition is dismissed as settled out of court.
Sd/-
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, JUDGE.
YKB
T.C. Rajesh
Sreedharan
P.B. Suresh Kumar
Murali Purushothaman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court