Noushad v. Mathai Varghese
Case brief
What is this about?
Rent Control Revision disposed by consent. The petitioner withdrew the revision and the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No legal proposition established.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 31ST BHADRA,
1944
RCREV. NO. 136 OF 2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 26.06.2013 IN RCP NO.18 OF 2011 OF MUNSIFF COURT,KAYAMKULAM CONCURRING WITH THE COMMON ORDER IN RCA NO.15 OF 2013 DATED 30.09.2015 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-I,MAVELIKKARA
REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
NOUSHAD, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O. MOHAMMED ALI, MALIKAKIZHAKKE MUKKUTHI PURAYIDATHIL, KAYAMKULAM MURI, KAYAMKULAM VILLAGE - 690 502.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR SRI.K.G.MANOJ KUMAR
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
NOUSHAD
- respondent
MATHAI VARGHESE
Coram
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court