Noushad v. Basheer Kutty
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition derived from a non-meritorious withdrawal order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022 / 31ST BHADRA,
1944
RCREV. NO. 103 OF 2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.02.2013 IN RCP NO.17 OF 2011 OF MUNSIFF COURT, KAYAMKULAM CONCURRING WITH THE COMMON ORDER IN RCA NO.9 OF 2013 DATED 30.09.2015 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-I, MAVELIKKARA
REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
NOUSHAD, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMMED ALI, MALIKAKIZHAKKA MUKKUTHI PURAYIDATHIL, KAYAMKULAM MURI, KAYAMKULAM VILLAGE.
BY ADV SRI.A.SHAFEEK (KAYAMKULAM)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
NOUSHAD
- respondent
BASHEER KUTTY
Coram
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court