Sindhu v. K.Ramachandran
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala disposed of MACA No.161 of 2014 by dismissing it for default, as the appellant failed to effect service notice and had not prosecuted the ten-year-old appeal.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 27TH POUSHA, 1943
MACA NO. 161 OF 2014
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPMV 1907/2002 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,THRISSUR
APPELLANT/S:
SINDHU.S AGED 33 YEARS W/O.C.V.AJITHKUMAR, KANNANATTU VARIAM, P.O.AYARKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT -686 564. BY ADV SRI.P.T.JOSE
RESPONDENT/S:
- 1 K.RAMACHANDRAN POONGODE HOUSE, P.O.ALATHUR, PALAKKAD.
2 NARAYANAN R S/O.RAMAN V, KALKUNNAMPADAM HOUSE, VENOOR,ALATHUR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 3 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LIMITED DIVISIONAL OFFICE, SOBHA T.S.M.COMPLEX,V.H.ROAD, PALAKKAD.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sindhu.S
- respondent
K.Ramachandran
- respondent
Narayanan R
- respondent
The Oriental Insurance Co.Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court