B.Gopakumar v. Pravitha
Case brief
What is this about?
Motor Accident Claims Appeal No. 867 of 2014 was dismissed for default as the appellant failed to issue notices to respondents as ordered by the Court six years prior.
What did the court decide?
Nil
What the court decided
1
MACA No.867 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 24TH POUSHA, 1943
MACA NO. 867 OF 2014
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPMV 2085/2005 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,NEYYATTINKARA
APPELLANT/S:
B.GOPAKUMAR CHATHURAVILAKATHU, KADAYARA PUTHEN VEEDU, THATTATHAMBALAM, KARAKONAM P.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV SRI.M.R.SASITH
Parties & counsel
- appellant
B. Gопakar Chathuravilakathu
- respondent
Pravitha
- respondent
The Branch Manager, The New India Assurance Co.Ltd.
- respondent
Sunil Kumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court