Prakash. B.P. v. Mony Roy
Case brief
What is this about?
Court held that no act of contempt was made out against respondents who removed petitioner from members' committee following statutory procedure, thus closed contempt proceedings. Petitioner directed to challenge removal via appropriate proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case is closed; no case of contempt is made out.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 19TH MAGHA, 1943 CON.CASE(C) NO. 91 OF 2022
AGAINST THE ORDER IN WP(C) 29437/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/1ST PETITIONER:
PRAKASH. B.P. AGED 54 YEARS S/O. BHASKARAN, PLAVILAYIL, PARANTHAL PARANTHAL KSHEEROLPADAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO. PT12(D) (APCOS), BY ADV K.K.SETHUKUMAR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1, 2, & 4:
1 MONY ROY AGED 51 YEARS SECRETARY, PARANTHAL KSHEEROLPADAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO. PT12(D) APCOS), PARANTHAL P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 689 518 2 LISSY MATHAI AGED 55 YEARS PRESIDENT, PARANTHAL KSHEEROLPADAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD NO. PT12(D) APCOS), PARANTHAL P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 689 518 3 SABITHA BEEGOM AGED 52 YEARS DIARY EXTENSION OFFICER, PANDALAM, PANDALAM P.O, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT 689 501 BY ADVS. D.KISHORE MEERA GOPINATH R.MURALEEKRISHNAN (MALAKKARA) ARYA JOSEPH
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PRAKASH. B.P.
- respondent
MONY ROY
- respondent
LISSY MATHAI
- respondent
SABITHA BEEGOM
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court