George Jacob, v. Biju Prabhakar,I.a.S
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/478/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Contempt case arising from WPC 34805/2019. Petitioner submitted that compliance with directions was completed and no further grievance existed. The court accepted this submission and closed the case.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed on submission of compliance.
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Contempt case closed on submission of compliance.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
¶4
FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1944
¶5
CON.CASE(C) NO. 478 OF 2022
¶6
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 34805/2019 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETIITONER:
¶7
GEORGE JACOB,
AGED 61 YEARS
S/O. JACOB, VARICKAT MOLEL HOUSE, KUTTICHIRA P.O,
KARAPADOM, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN 680 724, (CONDUCTOR,
RETIRED FROM KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,
CHALAKUDY DEPOT).
¶8
BY ADV C.V.MILTON
¶9
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.1 IN WPC:
¶10
BIJU PRABHAKAR,I.A.S,
MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT
CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 023.
¶11
SRI DEEPU THANKAN, SC
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
GEORGE JACOB
- respondent
BIJU PRABHAKAR
Coram
AI extract
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court