Petitioner filed contempt case alleging non-compliance of prior directions regarding land record reports. Respondent counsel submitted orders passed. Court closed contempt case, reserving right to challenge orders via appropriate proceedings.
Contempt case closed; petitioner reserved right to challenge substantive order via appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CON.CASE(C) NO. 113 OF 2022 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 5TH JYAISHTA, 1944 CON.CASE(C) NO. 113 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.20546/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER :
MARY LONAPPAN AGED 77 YEARS W/O. C.A. LONAPPAN, CHAKKANAT HOUSE, AYINI NADA, MARADU.P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. R.SANJITH C.S.SINDHU KRISHNAH CHARUTHA BHAIJU P.S.ANJU ANOOP GEORGE
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 3 :
1 JAFAR MALIK, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANADU, ERNAKULAM 682 030
2 SEERAM SAMBASIVA RAO, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF SURVEYS AND LAND RECORDS, SURVEY BHAVAN, COTTON HILL ROAD, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA-695014.
SMT SURYA BINOY, SR GP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 113 OF 2022 2
JUDGMENT
This Contempt Case (C) is filed alleging non-compliance of the directions issued by this Court in Annexure-A1 judgment. By the aforesaid judgment, this Court had directed the respondent to comply with the directions in Annexure-A2 judgment taking note of Exts.P13 and P15 and to conclude the entire procedure.
CON.CASE(C) NO. 113 OF 2022 3
way aggrieved, it is for the petitioner to challenge the same by initiating appropriate proceedings. Reserving such right, this Contempt Case (C) is closed.
Sd/-
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
JUDGE
NS
CON.CASE(C) NO. 113 OF 2022 4
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 113/2022
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 8/10/2020 IN W.P.(C) NO.20546/2020 OF THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Annexure A2 TRUE COPY OF JUDGMENT DATED 20/11/2019 IN W.P.(C) NO.30957/2019
Annexure A3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 16.1.2020 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT Annexure A4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 28.9.2020 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT Annexure A5 TRUE COPY OF THE CONTEMPT NOTICE DATED 24.11.2021, ALONG WITH THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD.
MARY LONAPPAN
JAFAR MALIK
SEERAM SAMBASIVA RAO
SMT SURYA BINOY
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
