Devadas Sukumaran v. Pradeep Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt case regarding compliance of a previous order. The respondent admitted compliance and credited funds. The court closed the case with liberty to reopen if payment is not received.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner given liberty to reopen contempt proceedings if the credited amount is not received.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 29TH MAGHA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1645 OF 2021
JUDGMENT DATED 10.10.2019 IN WP(C) 7018/2012 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITONER:
DEVADAS SUKUMARAN AGED 50 YEARS S/O. JOSEPH SUKUMARAN, RESIDING AT GRACE NEAR CSI CHURCH, MADAYI P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT, PRESENTLY WORKING AS LAB ASSISTANT AT THE BASEL EVANGELICAL MISSION PARSI HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS. T.MADHU C.R.SARADAMANI SHAHID AZEEZ RENJISH S. MENON
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
PRADEEP KUMAR
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KANNUR NORTH, KANNUR DISTRICT-670 002.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DEVADAS SUKUMARAN
- respondent
PRADEEP KUMAR
Coram
SHAJI P. CHALY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court