Dr. Saji.K v. S.Aananthakrishnan, IPS
Case brief
What is this about?
In this Contempt Case, the petitioner alleged non-compliance with directives dated 13.10.2017 regarding the shifting of an FL-1 shop. The court noted that the shop had already been shifted as submitted by counsel, rendering the matter devoid of substance.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed with no direction to comply as the alleged issue is resolved.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 29TH MAGHA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1159 OF 2021
JUDGMENT DATED 13.10.2017 IN WP(C) 31795/2017 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONERS:
- 1 DR. SAJI.K
CITY DENTAL CARE, VAIKOM P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 141.
- 2 DR. BREEZE TOMY,
- SKIN SPECIALIST, VAIKOM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 141.
- 3 SIBI ISSAC,
- VIKAS HOME APPLIANCES, VAIKOM P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 141.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DR. SAJI.K
- petitioner
DR. BREEZE TOMY
- petitioner
SIBI ISSAC
- respondent
S.AANANTHAKRISHNAN, IPS
- respondent
SHIHABUDHEEN
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court