Roy Scaria v. the Thiruvambadi Grama Panchayath
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 15TH MAGHA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 23050 OF 2015
PETITIONER:
ROY SCARIA
AGED 43 YEARS
S/O.N.J.SCARIA, NELLIKKATHERUVIL HOUSE, THIRUVAMBADI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT
BY ADV SRI.BABU S. NAIR
RESPONDENTS:
2 THE SECRETARY THE THIRUVAMBADI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, THIRUVAMBADI, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, PIN-673 603.
BY ADVS.
SRI.T.M.KHALID SRI.VINOD SINGH CHERIYAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.23050/2015
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 4th day of February, 2022
This writ petition is filed by the petitioners seeking the following reliefs:
(i) Call for the entire records leading upto Exhibit P2 and quash the same by the issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writs, orders or directions.
(ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writs, orders or directions commanding the respondents to assign numbers to the building constructed by the petitioner as per Exhibit P1 building permit in R.S.No.125 of the Thiruvambadi Village, forthwith, without any further delay.
(iii) Grant such other reliefs, as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is recorded and the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed
Sd/- SHAJI P. CHALY, JUDGE
smv
W.P.(C) No.23050/2015 3
Roy Scaria
The Thiruvambadi Grama Panchayath
The Secretary The Thiruvambadi Grama Panchayath
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court