Disposed
Sarojini.M.R., v. the Department of Health and Family Affairs
Kerala HCWP(C)/19226/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petitioners, class-IV casual workers faced with termination at age 60, sought enforcement of a Government Order extending retirement age to 65. The Court directed the second respondent to consider representations in light of relevant orders and consider extending the benefit, granting them a hearing opportunity within two months. No substantive right was immediately declared.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent to consider representations and decide within two months after hearing petitioners whether retirement age extension benefit applies to them.