The writ petitioner was employed as a contingent employee in the second respondent Municipality from 1/6/2016. The contingent employees are appointed under section 224(1) of the Kerala Municipality Act,1994. According to the petitioner, she has completed SSLC Examination and Computer Course and was engaged by the Municipality for data entry work. While so, by Ext.P1 resolution dated 22/1/2017, of the Municipal council, another employee was engaged from 16/1/2017 for data entry in connection with Ayyankali Employment Guarantee Scheme. The petitioner herein was allotted to that job on daily wages. While so, by Ext.P2 dated 12/12/2018 of the Municipality addressed to the Principal Secretary, Thiruvananthapuram, requesting to regularise the services of the petitioner and several other contingent employees. The petitioner has a case that, after the local self Government Election, there was a change in the Rule and the present ruling set up is not maintaining good relationship towards her. They propose to entrust the work to another person and has been attempting to terminate her. Accordingly, she was directed to not come for duty since 1/72021 onwards. No written order was issued to her and all other contingent employees were permitted to continue. Hence, the petitioner has preferred this writ petition seeking a relief directing that the petitioner may be declared as entitled to continue in service as contingent employee with all consequential service and monitory benefits. It was also sought that the respondents may be directed to permit the petitioner to continue to work as contingent employee, in
