Jibin v. Harris Rasheed
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt Court case upheld as closed following petitioner's submission and filed memo that the directions of the underlying W.P.(C) judgment had been complied with.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 18TH BHADRA,
1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 802 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28050/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/WRIT PETITIONER:
JIBIN AGED 35 YEARS S/O.KUNHAVARA, MAZHUVANCHERRY HOUSE, POIKKATTUSSERY, NEDUMBASSERY P.O., ERNAKULAM - 683 111.
BY ADV V.A.VINOD
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION:
HARRIS RASHEED (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, K.B.JACOB ROAD, FORT KOCHI, ERNAKULAM - 682 001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JIBIN
- respondent
HARRIS RASHEED
Coram
P.B.S. SURESH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court