The court closed the contempt case after the petitioner 's counsel submitted that the directions in the underlying judgment had been complied with. No separate order details the specific disposal outcome.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 17TH BHADRA,
1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1802 OF 2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 32625/2017 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER :
THOMAS GEORGE KALLUKARAN, AGED 65 YEARS S/O.K.A.GEORGE(LATE), 109/112, BILAKUDY CHAMBERS, ST.MARY'S ROAD, MAZAGON, MUMBAI- 400010, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER JOSE M.V., AGED 59 YEARS, S/O.M.V.VARKEY(LATE), MUNJANATTUKADUPPIL(H), KOTTAMALA P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN- 671314.
BY ADV SRI.AVANEESH KOYIKKARA
RESPONDENTS/2ND RESPONDENT :
SUHAS.S, IAS, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM- 682030.
BY SMT.B.VINITHA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C)NO.1802 OF 2019
..2..
Contempt Case (C) No.1802 of 2019
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the directions contained in the judgment have been complied with. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt of Court Case is closed.
Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE
rkj
CON.CASE(C)NO.1802 OF 2019 ..3..
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1802/2019
PETITIONER ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE A1 CERTIFIED COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P. (C)NO.32625 OF 2017 DATED 12.10.2017.
THOMAS GEORGE KALLUKARAN
SUHAS.S
P.B. SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
