P.v.Ali Mubaraq v. Salim
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner submitted that directions from a previous judgment were complied with. The court accepted this submission and closed the contempt of court case.
What did the court decide?
No specific relief was issued as the case was closed upon satisfaction of compliance.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 12TH ASWINA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 747 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 18.02.2021 IN WP(C) 13297/2019 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
P.V.ALI MUBARAQ, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O. ALAVIKUTTY, PEE VEE HOUSE, NILAMBUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-679330.
BY ADV BINOY VASUDEVAN
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
SRI.SALIM, AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGRICULTURAL FIELD OFFICER/CONVENOR, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, KRISHI BHAVAN, PUTHIYARA, KOZHIKODE-673004.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.V.ALI MUBARAQ
- respondent
SRI SALIM
Coram
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court