N.J. Johnson, v. v. Sheeja
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt case closed without prejudice to the petitioner's right to challenge the impugned order, following the judgment in WP(C) No. 17586/2020.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed without prejudice to right to challenge Order R1(a).
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 12TH ASWINA, 1943 CON.CASE(C) NO. 673 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 17.09.2020 IN WP(C) 17586/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
N.J. JOHNSON, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O. N. K. JACOB, ADVOCATE, RESIDING AT 'NEELAMKAVIL', ANRA 32, AMALA BHAVAN ROAD, KADAVANTHRA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682 020.
BY ADVS. T.K.AJITH KUMAR SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ
RESPONDENT:
V. SHEEJA AGRICULTURE OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, CHAVAKKAD, (CONVENER LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE, CHAVAKKAD MUNICIPALITY).
SMT.PRINCY XAVIER GOVERNMENT PLEADER
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.J. Johnson
- respondent
Smt. Sheeja
Coram
P.B.Suresh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court