M.a.James v. Suhas .S.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner alleged compliance with a prior order, and the court accepted the submission that the earlier judgment was complied with, thereby closing the contempt case.
What did the court decide?
Case closed as complied.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 19TH SRAVANA, 1943
CON.CASE(C) NO. 276 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.12.2020 IN WP(C) 23471/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
M.A.JAMES AGED 62 YEARS S/O. ANTONY, CONTRACTOR, MANNASSERIL HOUSE, THALAYAZHAM P.O., ULLALA, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN-686 607
BY ADVS. BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA SRI.M.G.SREEJITH SMT.K.S.ARCHANA
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
SUHAS.S.IAS AGE AND NAME OF THE FATHER ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER WORKING AS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI – 682 030
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.A.JAMES
- respondent
SUHAS.S
Coram
P.B.Suresh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court