Pionnieer Roofing Company v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
In WP(C) No.16924 of 2021, the petitioner challenged obstruction to factory access due to road renovation. The court closed the writ petition after the fourth respondent filed an affidavit undertaking to arrange alternative access routes and ensure traffic was not blocked.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed recording undertaking of the fourth respondent to provide alternate access and ensure smooth vehicular movement.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 16TH BHADRA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 16924 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
M/S.PIONNIER ROOFING COMPANY 10/ 569, CANAL PIRIVU, PAMPALLAM POST, KANCHIKKODE, PALAKKAD - 678621, REPRESENTED BY MANAGING PARTNER, SAJI C, AGED 52 YEARS, S/O. CHELLAPPAN.
BY ADVS. R.SUDHISH M.MANJU
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695001.
- 2 THE CHIEF ENGINEER (P.W.D ROADS DIVISION), PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695033.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be closed upon receipt of the fourth respondent's affidavit undertaking to ensure alternative vehicular access during road renovation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/S.PIONNIER ROOFING COMPANY
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
THE CHIEF ENGINEER (P.W.D ROADS DIVISION)
- respondent
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PALAKKAD DISTRICT
- respondent
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.W.D ROADS DIVISION
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court