Ismail, v. Asharaff
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the petitioner is unable to pay the court fee for the appeal due to insufficient annual income and the burden of a settlement deed restricting independent property transferability. The appeal cause number was numbered and posted for admission as an indigent person.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner is exempted from paying Court Fee and permitted to conduct the Appeal as an indigent person.
What the court decided
CMCP 32/2018
1 / 3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Present:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
Wednesday,the 7th day of April 2021/17th Chaithra, 1943
CMCP No.32/2018 in RFA €OF 2018
For information purpose only OS No.237/2014 of the II ADDITIONAL SUB COURT,THRISSUR
PETITIONER/PETITIONER
ISMAIL,,AGED 52 YEARS
S/O.RAYAMMARAKKAR VEETTIL MUHAMMED HAJI, MANALY DESOM, CHIRANELLUR VILLAGE, THALAPPILLY TALUK - 680 501.
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
- 1.ASHARAFF,,AGED 56 YEARS
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible to be permitted to conduct an appeal as an indigent person exempt from court fees.
Whether the petitioner has an insufficient annual income to meet the court fee payable for the appeal.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ismail
- respondent
Asharaff
- respondent
Sainaba
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court