Disposed
Pauly v. James
Kerala HCRFA/170/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court disposed of three regular first appeals (RFAs) as they had been settled via a Memorandum of Agreement. The appeals were concluded based on the mediation terms executed under Section 89 CrPC and Kerala Mediation Rules, with court fees refunded to appellants.
What did the court decide?
Appeals disposed of in accordance with the executed Memorandum of Agreement; court fees refunded to appellants in RFAs 170/2016 and 580/2013.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
¶4
TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 9TH CHAITHRA, 1943
¶5
RFA.No.580 OF 2013
¶6
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN O.S.No.713/2010
¶7
DATED 21-02-2013 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,THRISSUR
¶8
APPELLANT/1ST DEFENDANT:
¶9
POLY,
AGED 52 YEARS,
S/O.THARAYIL DEVASSY,
CHEMBUKAVU DESOM, VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.
BY ADVS.
SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURIKAN
SRI.P.V.BALAKRISHNAN
¶10
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF & 2ND DEFENDANT:
¶11
1JAMES,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
S/O.THARAYIL DEVASSY, THARAYIL HOUSE,
CHELAKKOTTUKARA DESOM, CHEMBUKAVU VILLAGE,
THRISSUR TALUK, PIN-680 006.
2JOSE,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
S/O.THARAYIL DEVASSY, THARAYIL HOUSE,
MUSEUM CROSS ROAD, CHELAKKOTTUKARA DESOM,
CHEMBUKAVU P.O., THRISSUR TALUK, PIN-680 020.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether appeals should be disposed of in accordance with the terms of a Memorandum of Agreement executed during mediation.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
POLY
- respondent
JAMES
- appellant
JOSE
- appellant
PAULY
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court