Disposed
Jose v. James
Kerala HCRFA/452/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala disposed of three first appeals jointly after parties executed a Memorandum of Agreement under Section 89 CPC and Kerala Civil Procedure (Mediation) Rules, 2008, ordering a refund of court fees to appellants.
What did the court decide?
Appeals disposed of in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement; court fee refunded to appellants PAULY and POLY.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
¶4
TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 9TH CHAITHRA, 1943
¶5
RFA.No.580 OF 2013
¶6
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN O.S.No.713/2010
¶7
DATED 21-02-2013 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,THRISSUR
¶8
APPELLANT/1ST DEFENDANT:
¶9
POLY,
AGED 52 YEARS,
S/O.THARAYIL DEVASSY,
CHEMBUKAVU DESOM, VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.
BY ADVS.
SRI.DINESH MATHEW J.MURIKAN
SRI.P.V.BALAKRISHNAN
¶10
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF & 2ND DEFENDANT:
¶11
1JAMES,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
S/O.THARAYIL DEVASSY, THARAYIL HOUSE,
CHELAKKOTTUKARA DESOM, CHEMBUKAVU VILLAGE,
THRISSUR TALUK, PIN-680 006.
2JOSE,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
S/O.THARAYIL DEVASSY, THARAYIL HOUSE,
MUSEUM CROSS ROAD, CHELAKKOTTUKARA DESOM,
CHEMBUKAVU P.O., THRISSUR TALUK, PIN-680 020.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether appeals filed against civil decrees should be disposed of upon execution of a mediation settlement.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
POLY
- respondent
JAMES
- appellant
JOSE
- appellant
PAULY
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court