Disposed

Bijeesh.E v. Kozhikode Corporation

Kerala HC19 Oct 2020WP(C)/12275/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This batch disposal addressed writ petitions filed by contractors aggrieved by payment delays for completed works under agreements with the Kozhikode Corporation. The court directed the Corporation to expedite payments strictly in accordance with the established priority list.

What did the court decide?

Direct the respondents to see that payment is made in accordance with the priority as expeditiously as possible.

Bijeesh.E Vs Kozhikode Corporation — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Kerala HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶4

MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 27TH ASWINA, 1942

¶5

WP(C).No.12254 OF 2020(F)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

P.GANESHAN, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.CHATHU.T.P., PUTHALATHU HOUSE, PANTHERANKAVE (PO), KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

¶8

BY ADVS. SRI.P.V.ANOOP SRI.PHIJO PRADEESH PHILIP

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

1 KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673 032.

¶11

2 ACCOUNTS OFFICER, KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673 032.

¶12

3 SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673 032.

¶13

4 THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, LSGD, KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673 032.

¶14

BY ADVS. SRI.V.KRISHNA MENON SMT.VINITHA.B. GP

¶15

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.10.2020, ALONG WITH WP(C).12275/2020(H), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

W.P.(C) No.12254 and 12275 of 2020

¶17

¶18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶19

PRESENT

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶21

MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 27TH ASWINA, 1942

¶22

WP(C).No.12275 OF 2020(H)

¶23

PETITIONER:

¶24

BIJEESH.E, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.KRISHNAN, EDAKANDY HOUSE, KOLATHARA (PO), KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

¶25

BY ADV. SRI.P.V.ANOOP

¶26

RESPONDENTS:

¶27

1 KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, OFFICE OF THE KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 032.

¶28

2 ACCOUNTS OFFICER, KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 032.

¶29

3 SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 032.

¶30

4 THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ZONAL OFFICE, BEYPORE, KOZHIKODE CORPORATION, KOZHIKODE, PIN-673 015.

¶31

BY ADVS. SRI.V.KRISHNA MENON SMT.VINITHA.B. GP

¶32

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.10.2020, ALONG WITH WP(C).12254/2020(F), THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶33

W.P.(C) No.12254 and 12275 of 2020

¶34

¶35

JUDGMENT

¶36

The petitioners in both these cases were awarded contract for construction of covering slabs to drainage in various wards in the Kozhikode Corporation/laying of road and both of them have completed the work after executing agreement with the respondents. Bills were also submitted before the Corporation. They are aggrieved by the delay in payment.

¶37

2. The 1^st respondent has filed a statement in W.P.(C) No.12254/2020 producing the judgment Annexure-A in O.P.No.27438/2000, according to which the payment to the contractors shall be made strictly in accordance with the priority. The respondents have stated that the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.12254/2020 is serial no.6 and petitioner in W.P.(C) No.12275/2020 is serial no.21. In Annexure-C priority list, persons who completed the work in 2016 and 2017 are also waiting for the payment. According to the

¶38

¶39

W.P.(C) No.12254 and 12275 of 2020

¶40

respondents, payment can be made only in accordance with the priority and a huge amount is due from the Government. It is stated that due to scarcity of funds, payment could not be made.

¶41

The learned counsel for the petitioner points out the difficulty faced by the contractors on account of delay in payment. Since there is no dispute with respect to the completion of work based on the contract awarded to the petitioners, there shall be a direction to the respondents to see that payment is made in accordance with the priority as expeditiously as possible. The Corporation shall take earnest efforts to see that the payment is made at the earliest.

¶42

Accordingly, the writ petition is

¶43

disposed of. Sd/-

¶44

P.V.ASHA JUDGE

¶45

¶46

W.P.(C) No.12254 and 12275 of 2020

¶47

¶48

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12254/2020

¶49

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR HANDING OVER THE SITE TO THE PETITIONER DATED 23.03.2017. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE FINAL BILL SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENTS. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.03.2020 IN WP(C) NO.1108 OF 2020.

¶50

W.P.(C) No.12254 and 12275 of 2020

¶51

¶52

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12275/2020

¶53

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶54

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 26.11.2016 IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

¶55

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE WORK ORDER NO.B2/EG/7652/ 14 DATED 09.12.2016. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE FINAL BILL DATED 24.05.2018 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENTS. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.03.2020 IN W.P.(C) NO.1108 OF 2020.

Bijeesh.E v. Kozhikode Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bijeesh.E v. Kozhikode Corporation

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

James Paul Vs Kerala Water Authority

James Paul Vs Kerala Water Authority

Amal Thomas Vs State of Kerala

P.Ganeshan Vs Kozhikode Corporation

N.Manoj Vs Kerala Water Authority

Sajith Kumar D.S., Vs Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd.