Sajith Kumar D.S., v. Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petition challenging regularisation of suspension. Court confirmed the order (Ext.P5) to the extent it regularised the suspension period, despite setting aside other orders.
What did the court decide?
The order in Ext.P5 to the extent it relates to the regularisation of the period of suspension is confirmed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 27TH ASWINA, 1942
RP.No.696 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 36168/2018
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 36168/2018(U) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C):
SAJITH KUMAR D.S., AGED 42 YEARS, S/O R.C.DIVAKARAN NADAR, SUB-ENGINEER, KSEB, KOTTUKAL ELECTRICAL SECTION, NEYYATINKARA DIVISION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, RESIDING AT 'THEKKE BUNGLOW', KANNARAVILA, NELLIMOODU P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 524.
BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WP(C):
1 KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order in Ext.P5 setting aside the regularisation of suspension stands confirmed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sajith Kumar D.S.
- respondent
Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd.
- respondent
The Chairman and Managing Director, Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd.
- respondent
The Chief Engineer (Human Resource Management), Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd.
- respondent
The Deputy Chief Engineer, Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court