Anila v. the Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition challenged refusal of Canara Bank to disburse further educational loan. Court held bank not liable to pay without sufficient security or heirs' consent. Writ dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner's petition for relief was dismissed.
What the court decided
WP(C).No.11586 OF 2020
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
FRIDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2020 / 17TH ASWINA, 1942
WP(C).No.11586 OF 2020(W)
PETITIONER/S:
ANILA
AGED 43 YEARS W/O.MICHAEL, MURINGAYIL,ONNAMKARA, THEKKEKKARA P.O., CHAMPAKULAM VILLAGE, ALAPPUZHA-688505.
BY ADVS. SRI.GEORGE MATHEW SHRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G
RESPONDENT/S:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bank is compelled to make further educational loan disbursements when partial security is insufficient and legal heirs refuse consent.
Whether the court can compel legal heirs to furnish consent for loan disbursements under a secured educational loan.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anila
- respondent
The Canara Bank Alappuzha Branch
- respondent
Unnikrishnan Nair
- respondent
Ajithkumar
- respondent
Anitha Kumary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court