Abdul Azeez K.M. v. S.Suhas
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt case, the petitioner alleged that the respondents failed to complete road demarcation and removal of encroachers. The Court noted discrepancies in the respondents' claims regarding completion and granted a four-week extension for compliance due to the pandemic, ultimately closing the case.
What did the court decide?
The respondents were granted four weeks time from 17.8.2020 to comply with directions; the contempt case is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2020 / 26TH SRAVANA, 1942
Con.Case(C).No.949 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 30552/2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 30552/2019(S) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC:
ABDUL AZEEZ K.M. AGED 66 YEARS, S/O.MUHAMMED, PUTHENVEETTIL, NETTOOR P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682 040.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.N.ABHILASH SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT SRI.M.A.AHAMMAD SAHEER SRI.P.B.MUHAMMED AJEESH
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to hold the respondents in contempt for failure to demarcate the road and remove encroachments as per the earlier judgment.
Whether to grant extension of time for compliance with the directions in view of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Abdul Azeez K.M.
- respondent
S.Suhas
- respondent
Beena P.Anand
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court