Anooplal S.G v. M.P.Dinesh
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt proceeding, the Court held that since the impugned order was not in accordance with earlier directions, the petitioner may challenge it via a separate writ petition. The contempt case was closed with liberty to file such a writ.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order in a separate writ petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 23RD MAGHA, 1941
Con.Case(C).No.215 OF 2020 IN WP(C) NO.12701/2016
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C)NO.12701/2016(K) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER:
ANOOPLAL S.G AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. S.K. GOVINDAN, MECHANIC GRADE - I, REGIONAL WORKSHOP, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THOTTAKKATTUKARA, ALUVA, RESIDING AT MATTATHIL HOUSE, PUTHIYAKAVU, TRIPUNITHURA P. O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-682301.
BY ADV. SRI. BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA
RESPONDENT:
M.P.DINESH, AGE AND NAME OF THE FATHER ARE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P. O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695023.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can challenge the order of the Managing Director of KSRTC in a separate writ petition instead of continuing the contempt case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anooplal S.G
- respondent
M.P.Dinesh
Coram
A.Muhamed Mustaque
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court