U.Suresh v. Ramesh
Case brief
What is this about?
A review petition filed by an Advocate challenging an order that recorded laches on his part was admitted. The court accepted the petitioner's explanation regarding the claimant's absence abroad and deleted the laches observation before disposing of the review petition.
What did the court decide?
The observation regarding laches on the part of the Advocate was deleted.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 22ND MAGHA, 1941
RP.No.151 OF 2020 IN OP (MAC). 66/2016
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP (MAC) 66/2016 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA dated 12.11.2019
REVIEW PETITIONER/ THIRD PARTY:
U.SURESH
AGED 52 YEARS
S/O.SETHUMADHAVAN, SURAKSHA HOUSE, PUTHUR, PALAKKAD
BY ADVS. SRI.SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT SRI.K.N.ABHILASH
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS AND PETITIONER:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the observation of laches on the Advocate in the original order should be deleted.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
U.SURESH
- respondent
RAMESH
- respondent
SHAIJU.K.T
- respondent
THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
- respondent
ABDUL NAZEER
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court